The My Birth My Choice campaign has released a statement sating that there are a number of issues surrounding women having Caesarean sections (C-sections) in South Africa.<\/p>\n
Last year, the Council for Medical Schemes revealed nearly 70 per cent of births by women covered by a medical aid scheme were by C-section, which raised concern among some health professionals due to safety concerns around the procedure.<\/p>
Patti Good, who leads the My Birth My Choice campaign, which aims to lower the C-section rate in South Africa\u2019s private sector, said money is a huge driving force.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe argument that comes back from the gynaecology profession is that their insurance premiums are so high and that they keep being pushed up.\u201d<\/p>
Good said the latest figures released indicate that gynaecologists are paying around R23,000 a month on insurance.<\/p>\n
\u201cI spoke to a gynaecologists\u2019 office this week and one birth is costing R15,000, so we\u2019re looking at two births to cover their insurance,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
The high number of child births via this method in the private medical sector is reportedly due to private hospitals pushing pregnant women to undergo the procedure, so they can have more births.<\/p>\n
Good said there\u2019s a huge convenience factor.<\/p>\n
\u201cI have been told on numerous occasions by senior medical professionals that they would be quite happy with a 100 per cent C-section rate.\u201d<\/p>\n
WHY IS THIS SUCH A BIG ISSUE?<\/strong><\/p>\n Good said there are a number of issues surrounding the high percentage of C-sections in the country.<\/p>\n \u201cThe research that I have done has indicated that the women don\u2019t want the C-sections. It indicates that over 80 percent of women actually want natural birth and feel like they were coerced, pushed and bullied into surgical birth that they neither wanted nor needed.\u201d<\/p>\n There are reportedly a number of reasons that doctors are encouraging women to go in this direction but adds the factors play in the doctors\u2019 favour and not in the mother or infants.<\/p>\n LONG TERM IMPLICATIONS \u201cWe see a dramatic increase in respiratory issues as these babies are suctioned. The second issue is that when a baby is born vaginally, its gut flora is populated by the mother\u2019s own bacteria and when [the birth] is surgical the flora is being populated by the theatre and the first person that touches it.<\/p>\n \u201cLong term health implications like asthma, diabetes, immune conditions and allergy responses in children are compromised and that has a major implication to worldwide healthcare moving forward.<\/p>\n WHAT\u2019S THE SOLUTION?<\/strong><\/p>\n Good says this issue in itself is incredibly easy to solve.<\/p>\n \u201cThe solution lies with the moms; it\u2019s up to the women to start doing better research.\u201d<\/p>\n She says the biggest kept secret is that women who have a great birth experience feel like heroes.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>
\nThe My Birth My Choice campaign head has said there are long term implications that arise from having a C-section, especially for the baby.<\/p>\n