{"id":126628,"date":"2016-07-05T12:46:53","date_gmt":"2016-07-05T10:46:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/germistoncitynews.co.za\/126628\/south-africa-votes-against-internet-freedom\/"},"modified":"2016-07-05T12:46:53","modified_gmt":"2016-07-05T10:46:53","slug":"south-africa-votes-against-internet-freedom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/news-headlines\/2016\/07\/05\/south-africa-votes-against-internet-freedom\/","title":{"rendered":"South Africa votes against internet freedom"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>South Africa has sided with authoritarian regimes like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and China on the issue of freedom of expression online.<\/p>\n<p>The UN resolution titled \u201cThe promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the internet\u201d, was adopted when more than 70 countries\u00a0supported it on 1 July.<\/p><div class=\"stream-item stream-item-in-post stream-item-inline-post aligncenter\"><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.article19.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Article 19<\/a>, an organisation dedicated to all matters of freedom of expression worldwide\u00a0expressed its\u00a0disappointment with\u00a0the decision.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDemocracies like South Africa, Indonesia and India voted in favour of these hostile amendments to weaken protections for freedom of expression online.\u201d<\/p><div class=\"stream-item stream-item-in-post stream-item-inline-post aligncenter\"><\/div>\n<p>The resolution means that countries\u00a0are bound to refrain from \u201cmeasures to intentionally prevent or disrupt access to or dissemination of information online\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Article 19 said that these measures include shutting down the internet or part of the internet at any time, such as during an election or in the aftermath of a terrorist attack.<\/p>\n<p>The resolution also condemns violence or intimidation against people for \u201cexercising their human rights and fundamental freedoms on the internet&#8221;. It also calls on countries to address security concerns online, including privacy.<\/p>\n<p>A\u00a0\u201chuman rights-based approach\u201d was also included in the resolution to provide and expand access to the internet, but South Africa voted against it.<\/p>\n<p>Led by China and Russia, South Africa joined the 15 countries that voted in favour of an amendment to have this section removed.<\/p>\n<p>Burundi, Cuba, India, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela were the other countries that voted for the removal of the &#8220;human .<\/p>\n<p>There was another amendment aimed at\u00a0removing freedom of expression language references in\u00a0the sections dealing with Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and \u00a0from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.<\/p>\n<p>Countries\u00a0voting in favour of the amendment included South Africa,\u00a0Bolivia, China, Cuba, India, Indonesia, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela.<\/p>\n<p>The full UN resolution is available\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.article19.org\/data\/files\/Internet_Statement_Adopted.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">on \u00a0Article 19\u2019s website<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"stream-item stream-item-below-post-content\">\n<div class='tenancy_slot tenancy_slot_1 jannah_ad' style='display: none;' data-query-id='2da13620a98130be177bf105908fac38'><\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>South African diplomats voted against a UN resolution that would prevent countries from switching off the internet or blocking their citizens&#8217; access to internet. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7783,"featured_media":126629,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"hasGravity":false,"cxt_article_byline":"Caxton Central","cxt_disable_google_ads":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,2],"tags":[1250,11622,5871,1847,11623,2362,5188,11624],"class_list":["post-126628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-local-news","category-news-headlines","tag-africa","tag-freedom-of-speech","tag-google","tag-information","tag-internet-freedom","tag-south-africa","tag-united-nations","tag-world-wide-web"],"amp_enabled":true,"category_labels":{"Category":"News","SubCategory":"Local news"},"tag_labels":["Africa","freedom of speech","google","information","Internet freedom","South Africa","united nations","world wide web"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7783"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126628"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126628\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/126629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.citizen.co.za\/germiston-city-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}